About Me

Name: Sam Aron
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Scary... We are PROFILING!

What happened to the US? Did we really forgot what our forefathers envisioned? Are we about - perhaps in the midst of the process - to sacrifice our ideals for the sake of so called security?

I can't express enough how angered I am, hearing on the news channels that we started the scary, ugly, nonhuman, sadistic practice of PROFILING. And the worst: no body is criticizing or even realizing how deep we sunk, in the name of security.

Here is the profiling story that you most probably missed.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1225032,00.html

As the US-British allies revealed the plot of using a poisonous liquids to blow up planes, they started with "collective Punishment" in the airports. They ordered all liquids out of the planes. Imagine the tons of pity liquids trashed in the garbage bins in Heathrow and JFK. Why are they penalized? Because the look alike that dangerous liquid that a few terrorists planned to use as a weapon?

According to the human rights rules, its a grave crime to profile a substance because of its practical similarity to a suspect. If we want to stop the danger, lets do random checks on all substances that are carried on planes - not differentiating between sticky stuff, wet, or pieces.

I'm cutting short my criticism, out of concern that some lefty radical will take it serious. Tomorrow we might see a group PELA - People for the Ethical Treatments of Liquids. You never know.

Although the discriminated substance is not a human being, its still underscoring the importance of profiling. In the above linked article, the writer is recognizing that it would be much easier to keep an eye on the potential perpetrators, then to try identify their weapons.

Its time to stop the nonsense, and waste crucial resources on random checks.

It would be much easier to use the visible signs that we have, to search a specific group of people. We all know that 99.9 percent of them are innocent, but it is in their interests, as in ours, to use practical searches to stop terrorists. After all, if - god forbid - their plane will blow up, it wouldn't profile, it will kill them together with the irish faces. So why shouldn't they agree for a few minutes of extra searching - the same that I want through lately in the Buffalo airport - in order to make sure that they and everybody is safe.

When the police are hunting for a sex offender, will they stop ladies? So why when the TSA is on the look out for Islamic terrorists, why are we ought to waste crucially needed personal on searching people we know that they're not the subjects of the search.

It's not collective punishment. It's looking in the right direction. Nobody is accusing anybody, and we love the honest American Muslims, but it's ridiculous to order the disposal of hard substances, when the danger is a liquid.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe, keep in mind Greenspan's advice


The old, retired man with the big glasses is having some tips that might also be correct and helpful in main street, in daily life, and even in politics: Be honest, and in the end you'll succeed!

While he's preparing 2 speeches, I would advice Joe Liebermann to keep this sentence in mind.

Joe is experiencing today what a few Wall St. execs went through several years ago. Their colleagues "cooked the books" to produce numbers that will earn them applause by the shareholders meeting. The honest people, who stuck to the laws, rules and truth, suffered a lot. Some where ousted in revolts, other saw their stock prices declining sharply. The chefs secured them selves hefty salaries, bonuses and pensions, while the true people didn't qualified for raises, due to their firm's poor performance.

I believe that when Greenspan stood before an audience of business grads or new college students, he had in mind this few execs who stuck to the truth, non withstanding how hard, against the stream, and unpopular it was. I don't remember the exact quote, but the substance was: don't be dragged into murky practices by others' successes. Go your way, and in the end you'll succeed!

Needless to say that a lot of the past successful chefs got burned from the fire. Yes, they enjoyed a year, two or three in prosperity, but it came to a quick end. Now, they, their company and investors are paying a heavy toll for it. Some companies had collapsed, had to reinstate earnings, pay fines, individuals are serving prison sentences, or standing trials.

The honest people suffered, but they're now vindicated. Now we realize that they didn't performed poorly, rather they presented the truth.

Now we have the same game in politics. Though there is no SEC to punish the crooks, public opinion will in the end see the real difference between honesty and opportunists, who'd do everything to win elections and ride with the stream.

Joe Liebermann is endangered because of his integrity. He's facing a possible defeat in the "appeasement" party because he stuck to his true ideals, and didn't abandoned a war that we started with good conscience.

I wish he should win today's primaries. Although I don't think that his party is deserving such a fine public servant on their ticket, I don't want him to go through the pain of loosing an election and being slapped for his honesty.

But in case he have to use the concession speech, continuing as an independent, I want Joe to remember that eventually his bravery and nobel stand will bring him recognition and praise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »